ETHICS COMMITMENT

Our Commitment to Research Ethics

WUJOPAS is committed to maintaining the highest standards of research ethics and integrity. We adhere to international guidelines and best practices to ensure that all published research meets ethical standards and contributes positively to the scientific community.

Ethical Principles

Our ethics policy is built on the following fundamental principles:

Integrity

Honest and transparent conduct in all research activities

Transparency

Open and clear reporting of research methods and findings

Fairness

Impartial and unbiased evaluation of all submissions

Responsibility

Accountability for research conduct and outcomes

Respect

Respect for participants, colleagues, and the research community

Excellence

Commitment to the highest standards of research quality

Author Responsibilities

Authors are expected to adhere to the following ethical standards:

Originality: All submitted work must be original and not previously published
Attribution: Proper acknowledgment of all sources and contributors
Data Integrity: Accurate reporting of research data and results
Conflict of Interest: Disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest
Human Subjects: Compliance with ethical guidelines for human research
Animal Welfare: Adherence to animal welfare guidelines where applicable
Ethics Approval

Research involving human subjects or animals must have appropriate ethics approval from relevant institutional review boards or ethics committees.

Editorial Responsibilities

Our editorial team is committed to maintaining ethical standards throughout the review process:

Editorial Independence: Decisions based solely on academic merit and quality
Fair Review: Impartial and constructive peer review process
Timely Processing: Efficient and timely handling of submissions
Confidentiality: Protection of author and reviewer identities
Conflict Management: Proper handling of conflicts of interest
Misconduct Handling: Appropriate response to ethical violations

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining research ethics:

Confidentiality: Maintain confidentiality of reviewed manuscripts
Constructive Feedback: Provide helpful and constructive comments
Timely Response: Complete reviews within agreed timeframes
No Plagiarism: Do not use ideas from reviewed manuscripts
Professional Conduct: Maintain professional and respectful communication
Conflict Disclosure: Report any conflicts of interest immediately

Common Ethical Violations

The following are considered serious ethical violations:

Plagiarism

Using someone else's work without proper attribution or permission

Duplicate Publication

Publishing the same work in multiple journals without disclosure

Data Fabrication

Creating or falsifying research data to support conclusions

Data Manipulation

Selectively reporting or manipulating data to support hypotheses

Ghost Authorship

Including authors who did not contribute to the work

Gift Authorship

Excluding authors who made significant contributions

Consequences

Ethical violations may result in manuscript rejection, retraction, and notification to relevant institutions and funding agencies.

Ethics Violation Process

When ethical violations are suspected, we follow a structured process:

1. Initial Assessment

Review the alleged violation and gather relevant information

2. Committee Review

Convene an ethics committee to investigate the matter

3. Author Response

Provide opportunity for authors to respond to allegations

4. Decision Making

Make a decision based on evidence and established guidelines

5. Notification

Notify relevant parties of the decision and any actions taken

6. Documentation

Document the process and maintain records for future reference

Report Ethics Concerns

If you have concerns about potential ethical violations, please contact our ethics committee.